Wednesday, February 19, 2020

Shadow Side of Leadership Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Shadow Side of Leadership - Assignment Example Harper’s article explains the shadow side of leadership as being founded on â€Å"A combination of self-centered attitudes, motivations, and behaviors that have adverse effects on subordinates, the corporation, and the mission performance† (Harper 2014). Toxic leadership has numerous ethical concerns that violate both the code of ethics and conduct and code of human resources (Mason 1993). In every organization, a leader stands at the peak of the hierarchy or structure of management. Followers or employees stand at the base of the hierarchy. Therefore, employees report to the leaders. Toxic leaders lack respect, integrity, competence, and general responsibility towards the employees. The outcomes of such are high staff turnover, job dissatisfaction, employee disempowerment, and redundancy. According to Peters and Austin, (2003) leadership is not innate. Leaders must be followers at one point in time. It should be noted that, a leader decides on the best way possible to govern the organization through working with a human resources team. There are many ways to lead a team effectively. Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, and Steve Jobs portrayed effective leadership styles. In the same way, leaders can prevent themselves from being perceived as toxic and ensure that those reporting to them become the best that they can be. Leaders ought to integrate the code of ethics and conduct and code of human resources to govern a human resources team effectively. Both the code of ethics and conduct and code of human resources require that leaders uphold respect, integrity, competence, and general responsibility (Embse et al., 2010). In addition, effective leadership ought to focus on empowering the employees, who are prospective leaders. Leaders enhance job security among the empl oyees by ensuring that they [employees] realize their full potential. The leadership style adopted

Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Sociological Imagination Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 1

Sociological Imagination - Essay Example capacity to shift from one perspective to another; the capacity to range from the most impersonal and remote transformations to the most intimate features of the human self – and to see the relations between the two of them. (1959: 9) The theorist is of the view that social change is an inevitable phenomenon that takes place in all human societies of the globe at large from the most primitive to the most modern ones. This social change, according to the theorist, may be the outcome of some immediate incident or catastrophe as well as the historical background of the society where the change is going to come about. Such transformation can alter the entire social environment including the prevailing social norms and traditions existing within a social set up. Mills believed that the persons need to have an understanding of the history of their society to understand the society, and themselves in it, and through this determine what their moral values are.  (Quoted in members.oz email.com.au) Hence, the latest or upcoming change can be estimated by looking into the traits and characteristics of transformations took place in the society in past. Since social change is inevitable in every culture and civilization and has been in vogue for centuries everywhere in the world, it vehemently revolutionizes professional, domestic, cultural and religious milieu. Though the pace, causes and consequences of such cultural transformations may be divergent in nature, scope and exposure, yet these are sure to pave the way towards adaptation of new ways, style and approaches in their wake. It sometimes happens that one single event or incident may bring revolutionary changes in social establishment. For instance, wars and hostilities inflicted by the big powers upon the weak countries deteriorate the very foundations of the vanquished states; as the lust of the western countries to capture the wealth and territories of the financially rich but strategically weak countries of Asia